Nearly 50 percent of children raped
Are raped within the family. Traditionally
We don’t mention that traditional family value
___
« Hero | Main | The books are packed with empty pages »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
This is just one of many truths we mostly fail to acknowledge. Thank you for always being one to speak truth to injustice.
Posted by: Jean | 28 December 2009 at 16:22
ditto!
it is far more traditional to pretend that gays are all traditionally pedophiles etc
yet all stats prove that the average child is safer with the gay couple next door than a het uncle...
peace
ab
Posted by: alicia banks | 28 December 2009 at 17:43
Bullshit.Children may be safe but teenage boys would not last a second before one of the luvvies made a jump on them.I spent months in a gay hostel in New York and can tell you that they are incapable of going beyond their urges.Families often suck but not as much as gay men pretending that what moves them is the heart,it is the ass.
Posted by: sare vigo | 02 January 2010 at 21:12
Sare vigo,
Not sure whether you're commenting on my poem or on Alicia's comment. If it's the poem you'd best register your opinion with The State of California Office of the Attorney General (re: Megan's Law). The stats for the poem (Nearly 50 percent of children raped are raped within the family) are theirs not mine. http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/facts.htm
As for your view that all heterosexuals are only looking for love but all homosexuals are only looking for sex, I disagree and wonder what research you have done to gather your data.
I suspect the law considers both girls and boys under the age of consent to be children.
You write of "luvvies", a derogatory term for actors and maintain that they are incapable of not "jumping on" teenage boys. Do you suggest under age boys should be protected from Sean Connery or Harrison Ford?
Posted by: LS | 04 January 2010 at 00:35